INEC Chairman, Professor Attahiru Jega
Chairman
of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Prof. Attahiru Jega,
has said that he is happy about the successful conduct of the 2015
general elections, expressing the hope that there will be improvement in
future elections.
Jega scored the resident electoral
commissioners high, saying it was the sacrifice, hard work and tireless
efforts of the RECs that resulted in the successful outcome of the polls
as seeing by Nigerians.
He said that INEC sacrificed a lot to
ensure the success of the elections, adding that one of the sacrifices
was the death of the former Kano State REC, Alhaji Munkaila Abdullahi.
Jega
stated this in Uyo, the Akwa Ibom State capital, during the post-2015
general elections assessment retreat for RECs. The retreat held on
Thursday with the theme, “2015 general elections: Lessons and way
forward.”
The INEC chairman said the retreat
offered the electoral officials the opportunity to review what they had
done from 2011 to 2015 and to focus attention on areas where the
commission needed improvement.
He said, “I congratulate all electoral
commissioners for a job well done and for contributing to the success in
conducting 2015 general elections.
“We had worked very hard and tirelessly;
we have had to make enormous sacrifices in order to get the outcome
that we had. And one of those sacrifices was the untimely death of one
of us, the electoral commissioner of Kano State, Alhaji Munkaila
Abdullahi.
“These are sacrifices we had to make for
our country because as Nigerians we want our country to progress and to
develop, and we want the process of governance to satisfy the needs and
aspirations of our people.”
Jega, however, said that the states
where the use of the card readers was suspended for manual accreditation
for the governorship and state house of assembly elections breached
INEC directives that on no account should manual accreditation be
administered for both elections.
The commission chairman assured that the
tribunal would look into the areas where card readers were jettisoned
in favour of manual accreditation, saying there was a difference between
using card readers and using incident forms.
He said, “What we meant by saying that
card readers must be used was that we did not expect in any polling unit
any person to say that the card readers were not functioning, and as a
result opted for manual accreditation, no.
“We asked those who had experienced card
readers’ failure to come back the following day, assuring them that we
would replace the card readers for the election to take place.”
No comments:
Post a Comment